Imposturas Intelectuais (Alan Sokal & Jean Bricmont). 2 likes. Book. The Reception of the Sokal Affair in France—”Pomo” Hunting or Intellectual Mccarthyism?: A Propos of Impostures Intellectuelles by A. Sokal and J. Bricmont. Back to Alan Sokal’s Physics Department Page (see also old page) .. , Trimestre 2, ); Review of Imposturas Intelectuais, by Sara.

Author: Tut Aralmaran
Country: Burundi
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Environment
Published (Last): 15 June 2011
Pages: 314
PDF File Size: 13.99 Mb
ePub File Size: 13.15 Mb
ISBN: 492-1-44173-764-7
Downloads: 33446
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Vukinos

Retrieved 25 June London Review of Books. University of Michigan Press. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. The book has been criticized by post-modern philosophers and by scholars with some interest in continental philosophy. Event occurs at 3: Two Millennia of Mathematics: Bruce Fink offers a critique in his book Lacan to the Letterwhere he accuses Sokal and Bricmont of demanding that “serious writing” do nothing other than “convey clear meanings”.

The extracts are intentionally rather long to avoid accusations of taking sentences out of context. Views Read Edit View history.

Perhaps inposturas is genuine when he speaks of non-scientific subjects? Number Theory for Computing 2nd ed. But a philosopher who is caught equating the erectile organ to the square root of minus one has, for my money, blown his credentials when it comes to things that I don’t know anything about. Print Hardcover and Paperback. At Whom Are We Laughing?

The Knowable and the Unknowable. This latter point has been disputed by Arkady Plotnitsky one of the authors mentioned by Sokal in his original hoax. Alan Sokal Jean Bricmont. Fink says that “Lacan could impoeturas assume that his faithful seminar public The book was published in French inand in English in ; the English editions were revised for greater relevance to debates in the English-speaking world.


Imposturas Intelectuais, de Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont

The book gives a chapter to each of the above-mentioned authors, “the tip of the iceberg” of a group of intellectual practices that can be described as “mystification, deliberately obscure language, confused thinking and the misuse of scientific concepts. Retrieved 15 April Postmodernism Philosophy of science. However, with regard to the second sense, which Plotnisky describes by stating that “all imaginary and complex numbers are, by definition, irrational,” [24] mathematicians agree with Sokal and Bricmont in not taking complex numbers as irrational.

Retrieved from ” https: He then writes of his hope that in the future this work is pursued more seriously and with dignity at the level of the issues involved. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Sokal and Bricmont set out to show how those intellectuals have used concepts from the physical sciences and mathematics incorrectly.

The stated goal of the book is not to attack “philosophy, the humanities or the social sciences in general University of Minnesota Press. While Fink and Plotnitsky question Sokal and Bricmont’s right to say what definitions of scientific terms are correct, cultural theorists and literary critics Andrew Milner and Jeff Browitt acknowledge intrlectuais right, seeing it as “defend[ing] their disciplines against what they saw as a misappropriation of key terms and concepts” by writers such as Lacan and Irigaray.

Probably no one concerned with postmodernism has remained unaware of it.

Imposturas Intelectuais, de Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont

Rather, they aim to draw attention to the abuse of concepts from mathematics and physics, subjects they’ve devoted their careers to studying and teaching. In Jacques Derrida ‘s response, “Sokal and Bricmont Aren’t Serious,” first published in Le MondeDerrida writes that the Sokal hoax is rather “sad,” not only because Alan Sokal’s name is now linked primarily to a hoaxnot to sciencebut also because the chance to reflect seriously on this issue has been ruined for a broad public forum that deserves better.

  2P4M PDF

Sokal is best known for the Sokal Affairin which he submitted a deliberately absurd article [1] to Social Texta critical theory journal, and was able to get it published. They argue that this view is held by a number of people, including people who the authors label “postmodernists” and the Strong Programme in the sociology of science, and that it is illogical, impractical, and dangerous.

Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science Cover of the first edition. Sokal and Bricmont highlight the rising tide of what they call cognitive relativismthe belief that there are no objective truths but only local beliefs.

Alan Sokal Articles on the “Social Text” Affair

From Archimedes to Gauss. He suggests there are plenty of scientists who have pointed out the difficulty of attacking his response.

Richard Dawkinsin a review of this book, said regarding the discussion of Lacan: He takes Sokal and Bricmont to task for elevating a disagreement with Lacan’s choice of writing styles to an attack on his thought, which, in Fink’s assessment, kntelectuais fail to understand.