Pourquoi Philosopher? Jean-François Comment et pourquoi, personnellement , je crois. Jean François Lyotard: Critical Evaluations in Cultural Theory. Buy Pourquoi philosopher? by Jean-François Lyotard, Corinne Enaudeau (ISBN : ) from Amazon’s Book Store. Everyday low prices and free. Get this from a library! Pourquoi philosopher?. [Jean-François Lyotard; Corinne Enaudeau].
|Published (Last):||12 August 2012|
|PDF File Size:||7.29 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.62 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Enter the email address you signed up with and we’ll email you a reset link. This openness being the purview of philosophy, Marxism becomes a critical theory a critical theoretical practice? Marx is, in effect, still a philosophee reference; but he is on his way to the nigh-unrecognizable Marx of the postmodern and late Lyotard.
Against this background, Pourquoi Philosopher? McLennan lectures and throughout his career, accords philosophy a terribly humble place relative to the grand pretensions of its history — but for all that, defends it tenaciously.
Lyotard denies philosophy an origin, in a double sense. Click here to sign up. Trying to hit upon a radical Leftism ;ourquoi of the Soviet bureaucratic perversion of Marxism, but also immune to the comparatively abstract, humanistic moralising of much post- European Leftism cf.
Jean-François Lyotard, Pourquoi Philosopher? – PhilPapers
Remember me on this computer. Help Center Find new research papers in: Presses Universitaires de France,pp.
It will be recognized among Lyotard scholars that the introductory course marks an important period: If to philosophize is to desire, and if desire constitutively eludes completion, then philosophy is timeless; it is older than its emergence in writing in ancient Greece, and it will never be finished. All of the substance of the postmodern and late Lyotard is here in embryonic form. Second, he denies the historical claim that philosophy originates in a particular time and place, for instance, with the pre- Socratics.
As previously mentioned, to my mind the lecture on language is in a sense the most surprising and therefore the most interesting of the four. Log In Sign Up.
Historical aspect aside, the meta-philosophical questions raised in the text should be engaging to even the most casual or novice reader of Lyotard. Socialisme ou barbarie itself splintered during this period under the weight of objective disappointments and a series of divisive and decidedly non-Marxist theses advanced by Cornelius Castoriadis.
The course is broken into four lectures, each of which treats a different aspect or way into its animating question: The aforementioned questions of desire and of philosophical discourse set the agenda.
“Pourquoi Philosopher?” by Jean-François Lyotard | Matthew R. McLennan –
Relegated as he was to a opurquoi footnote of late twentieth century continental philosophy during the first decade of the twenty-first, something of a Lyotard renaissance is now underway on both sides of the Atlantic.
Skip to main content. Lyotard criticizes the communicational ideology of language as an inert material by which to convey messages, locating the supposed subject-who- speaks in the mesh of a language which always already precedes her.